LG Autonomy: FAAC won’t release funds to CTC Chairmen – Ozekhome gives implications | Read More
A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Mike Ozekhome, has explained the implications of the Thursday’s Supreme Court judgment on Local Government Council Autonomy.
Ozekhome in his reaction stated that by the supreme court’s judgment, the Federation Account Allocation Committee, FAAC will not send funds to local government areas headed by Caretaker Committee Chairmen except elected chairmen.
“The judgement of the government is clear. If you want to receive funds from the federation account, then conduct an election,” Ozekhome said.
“If what you have in place is a caretaker committee as local government chairman, be sure that it will not have money from the federation account.”
“What this law is saying is that if you are not a democratically elected local government council, you cannot have this money under section 162 subsection 5 and 6 of the 199 Constitution.
“So, what it means is that money should now be ploughed to those local governments that are in existence democratically” Ozekhome said while featuring on Channels Television’s sunrise programme, The Morning Brief on Friday.
He said that states and local development councils can find a way to share the money internally after the constitutionally recognised local governments have received it from FAAC.
“They can do that internally to share. That is their internal business, nobody can control that one.
But for now the money can only go to those local government areas named in the constitution. Don’t forget they are even named in the constitution, 774 local governments..
“If you want money from the federation account, such councils must be democratically elected” the legal luminary added.
The Supreme Court in a judgement on Thursday, ruled that the federal government should henceforth pay allocations directly to local government councils from the federation account.
The seven-member panel of justices declared that it is unconstitutional for state governors to hold onto funds meant for Local Government (LG) administrations.
The Supreme Court also barred governors from dissolving democratically elected Local Government councils in their states
It ordered that the Federal Government should withhold allocations of LGAs governed by unelected officials appointed by the governors.
